This text was published for the first time in June 2000.
Linguists have traditionally classified languages into three rhythm classes, namely stress-timed,
syllable-timed and mora-timed languages. However, this classification has remained controversial
for various reasons : the search for reliable acoustic cues to the different rhythm types
has long remained elusive ; some languages are claimed to belong to none of the three classes ;
and no perceptual study has bolstered the notion. However, Ramus, Nespor & Mehler (1999),
Cognition 73, 265-292, have recently proposed an acoustic/phonetic model of the different
types of linguistic rhythm, and of their categorization as such by listeners. Their simulations
make predictions as to which languages can be discriminated on the basis of their rhythm.
Here, we present perceptual experiments that directly test the notion of rhythm classes, the
simulations’ predictions and the question of intermediate languages. Language discrimination
experiments were run using a speech resynthesis technique to ensure that only rhythmical cues
are available to the subjects. Languages investigated are English, Spanish, Catalan and Polish.
Discrimination results are compatible with the rhythm class hypothesis, but Polish rhythm
seems to be different from any other language studied and thus may constitute a new rhythm
class. A revised version of the rhythm perception model is proposed to accommodate these
findings and more simulations are run to generate new predictions.
Key-words : speech rhythm, prosody, language discrimination, speech perception, stresstiming,
syllable-timing.
